List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element |
| |
1 | Identify pneumatic/hydraulic system problems | 1.1 | Categorise the types of equipment malfunctions due to fluid power problems |
| 1.2 | Identify the effects on product quality of fluid power problems |
| 1.3 | Describe the function of components on the fluid power circuit diagram |
| 1.4 | Identify possible faulty components from a circuit diagram |
| 1.5 | Identify hazards arising from the problem and implement appropriate hazard control |
2 | Implement appropriate corrective action | 2.1 | Identify other possible problems |
| 2.2 | Short list possible fault problems |
| 2.3 | Investigation machine, products or data to determine most likely problem causes |
| 2.4 | Take appropriate action to ensure problem is rectified |
| 2.5 | Follow up on action to ensure completion in an appropriate timeframe |
| 2.6 | Recheck after corrective action to ensure problem has been rectified |
3 | Develop maintenance requirements | 3.1 | Check manufacturer instructions to determine recommended maintenance schedule |
| 3.2 | Check fault and maintenance history to determine adequacy of current regime and special requirements |
| 3.3 | Determine criticality of machine to production/business |
| 3.4 | Develop maintenance schedule/requirements for machine |
| 3.5 | Liaise with all relevant stakeholders to ensure schedule is appropriate |
| 3.6 | Report outcome to appropriate personnel |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy all of the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and demonstrate the ability to:
identify fluid power problem and possible problem causes
take appropriate action in a timely manner
apply operational knowledge to non-routine problems
develop appropriate maintenance schedule/requirements.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
hazards and hazard controls specific to the fluid power system and the plant it is used on
principles of hydraulics/pneumatics and circuit components
fluid power circuit diagrams
types and causes of known fluid power problems for the plant unit and its components
corrective action appropriate to the problem cause
appropriate investigation procedures and use of equipment for a range of equipment faults.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence:
should occur over a range of situations which include typical disruptions to normal, smooth operation of an operating plant
will typically include a supervisor/third-party report focusing on consistent performance and problem recognition and solving. A supervisor/third-party report must be prepared by someone who has a direct, relevant, current relationship with the person being assessed and who is in a position to form a judgement on workplace performance relevant to the unit of competency
will typically include the use of an appropriate industrial item of equipment requiring demonstration of operation, start and stop procedures and responding to problems
may use industry-based simulation for all or part of the unit particularly where safety, lack of opportunity or significant cost is an issue.
Assessment should occur in operational workplace situations. Where this is not possible, or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors, assessment must occur in a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
demonstration of skills
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence (provided a record is kept) or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
As a minimum, assessors must satisfy the Standards for Registered Training Organisations 2015 assessor requirements.